Justices side with government in property rights case

Justices side with government in property rights case”

In delivering the opinion of the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy said the family had not been deprived of all economically beneficial use of their property. In recent decades, property rights advocates have aggressively tried to limit regulation by demanding compensation.

However, under state law, if abutting, commonly owned lots don't each have at least one acre of developable land, they together constitute a single, buildable lot. The rules were created to prevent too much development along the St. Croix River.

The Murrs wanted to sell the lot next to their cabin, but were denied a county land variance to separately use or sell their two adjoining lots. The lots were later transferred to his children in the 1990s. Under the regulations, they could build a house that was bigger than the existing one, but they could not have two houses on the two lots which now were considered merged into one.

"We will continue the fight for property owners and for the integrity of the constitutional right against uncompensated government takings", he continued.

The family appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that separate property interests, even if adjacent and owned by the same person, can not be combined to determine claims of whether property has been taken through regulation. But today the justices ruled in favor of the regulators.

The 5-3 ruling on Friday involved the Murr family's effort to sell part of its land along the St. Croix River.

"The issue here was for a specific and legitimate objective", he observed.

Holmes made that statement in the very opinion that first established the concept of a regulatory taking. They planned to use the proceeds from an empty lot to pay for improvements on a cabin that sits on adjacent land. In the end, he said, the loss in the value of the Murrs' land was only about 10 percent.

Roberts said he disagreed with the majority's analysis of other factors besides state and local law, including physical characteristics of the land and its prospective value.

"This is an unfortunate decision for the Murrs, and all property owners", said John Groen, PLF's Executive Vice President and General Counsel.

William Treanor, Dean of Georgetown University Law Center, said the decision would have a profound effect in cases involving wetlands. The ruling could make it harder for property owners to prove compensation claims. Courts must strive for consistency with the central objective of the Takings Clause: to "bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole.".

TOTENBERG: Harvard Law School's Richard Lazarus calls the decision a huge victory for government regulators and environmentalists.

"There is no nuance to the ruling", he said.

The case was closely watched by property rights and business groups that say it should be easier for landowners to get compensation when government regulations restrict land use. "It just looks at the most environmentally sensitive part, and restricts your use of that piece".

The ruling (PDF) came three months after the court heard oral arguments in Washington, D.C. The justices agreed with lower courts that the county's regulations meant to limit development on the lower river did not illegally deprive land-owners of its value.

Roberts acknowledged that the test he suggested might have ended up with the same result, meaning the regulations at issue would not have amounted to a taking of private property, and the Murrs would not have qualified for compensation.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who joined the court after the case was argued, did not participate in Friday's decision.

Like this


26 June 2017
Vice President Ansari Greets People on Eid-ul-Fitr
She hoped the spirit of generosity, discipline and piety generated through the Holy month is carried hereafter by people in day to day life as well.

26 June 2017
Man Visits Disneyland 2000 Times In a Row
Along the way he's met many celebrities, and tried the food at almost every restaurant saying, " Pizza Port is my go to place". Reitz said that he likes to talk to the working crew and tries the different rides every time.

26 June 2017
'A Very Narrow Path' to Repeal Obama's Healthcare Law
The new bill is meant to walk a delicate line in its relatively modest tweaks to the measure that passed the House last month. The joint statement by Paul and the other three conservatives said they don't support the bill but are "open to negotiation".

26 June 2017
Red Sox retire No. 34 for David Ortiz
Ortiz ranks third in franchise history in doubles (524), extra-base hits (1,023) and RBIs (1,530). He can continue to smile knowing his number looks good sitting above Fenway Park .

26 June 2017
GOP sen: 'We should not be voting' on healthcare this week
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has finally unwrapped his plan for dismantling President Barack Obama's health care law. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has a challenge on unifying his party to successfully repeal the Affordable Care Act.

26 June 2017
Israel to Heed PA Request to Cut Electricity to Hamas-Controlled Gaza
He was referring to the fact that Hamas tossed the Palestinian Authority out of Gaza in a military coup in 2007. The political and security cabinet yesterday chose to reduce the supply of electricity to the Gaza Strip.

26 June 2017
Cyclist rides across the U.S. to hear late daughter's heartbeat
Conner was filmed crying as he used a stethoscope to listen to the heartbeat of his daughter Abbey inside another person's chest. In the very same week, Abbey Connor was found unconscious at the bottom of a hotel pool while on vacation in Cancun, Mexico.

26 June 2017
Hamilton claims Canada GP as Vettel stumbles
Red Bulls' Daniel Ricciardo took the third position on the podium , marking his hat-trick of finishing third after similar results in Spain and Monaco.

26 June 2017
Andy Murray to warm up for Wimbledon at Hurlingham event
He's not playing much, but when he's playing, he's winning. "I think the second half of the season is going to be really, really interesting".

26 June 2017
Trump May Face Lawsuit For "Unprecedented Constitutional Violations"
It is at least the third filed by groups and businesses anxious that Trump might be profiting personally from his presidency. The Trump Organization has promised in the past to take steps to address some ethics concerns.